seven natural law principles
The Natural Jurisdiction for Objective Authoritative Natural Rights
There are seven objective principles in total – This is the SIXTH principle. The sixth and seventh principles are a result from the first five principles.
.Natural law objectivity
The Natural Jurisdiction for Objective Authoritative Natural Rights
This is not a legal document and is not to be used legally in any country – This is a philosophical prescription for posterity to think about in future generations. This document is not to be used in a legal manner in any country.
The “The Natural Jurisdiction for Objective Authoritative Natural Rights” is a natural and objective jurisdiction that simply declares “how things are” regarding authoritative positions for the human species.
“The Natural Jurisdiction for Objective Authoritative Natural Rights” is predicated on five objective principles:
“The Objective Principle of Embodiment,”
“The Objective Principle of Natural Authority,”
“The Objective Principle of Natural Self-Ownership,”
“The Objective Principle of Natural Individual Liberty,” and
“The Objective Ethically-Just Exchangeable Property Principle.”
“The Natural Jurisdiction for Objective Authoritative Natural Rights” delineates the existent authoritative position for the “Sovereign Individual” in the confines of Natural Law; this is a Natural Law jurisdiction and should not be confused with legality in social civil law systems.
This document is simply declaring a Natural Law philosophical jurisdiction, and this document is not to be used as a legal aid, defense, or shield in any country; this document is not to be used as real or actual law in any current traditional country. “The Natural Jurisdiction for Objective Authoritative Natural Rights” is a philosophical position, and is a blueprint proposal for how posterity may organize ethically to build peaceful future societies.
The Natural Jurisdiction for Objective Authoritative Natural Rights
(1) “Natural Authority” is intrinsically “Embodied” in every “Individual” beginning at his or her natural “Primordial Genesis.”
(2) The “Individual,” regardless of his or her gender, age, ethnicity, color, sexual orientation, human physiological difference, human physiological transition, lineage, geographical origin, religion, absence of religion, or creed is a “Natural Self-Owner” inherently “Embodied” with “Natural Authoritative possession of their “own mind” and their “own body.”
(3)“ Natural Authority” which is inherently “Embodied” in every “Natural Self-Owner” is the “Apotheosis of Authority” regarding what the “Natural Self-Owner” owns; the “Natural Self-Owner” has “Natural Authority” to own his or her own “Human Corporeal Property (His or her own human body),” “Human Incorporeal Property, (His or her own mind and all of his or her own human cognitive faculties)” and all obtained “Legitimate Exchangeable Property (Honest property obtained without deploying any aggress to another non-aggressor).”
(4) The “Natural Self-Owner” has “Natural Authority” to authoritatively possess and control all inherent “Individual Cognitive Assets: Knowledge, Understanding, Wisdom, Ideas, Know-how, Imaginations, and Secrets in the mind, which derive from his or her own reason.
(5) The “Natural Self-Owner” has “Natural Authority” to authoritatively possess and control how “Individual Cognitive Assets” will be voluntarily released to another person, persons, groups, businesses, institutions, or society at large; The “Natural Self-Owner” authoritatively can release at will their own “Individual Cognitive Assets” freely, contractually or contain them indefinitely.
(6) The “Natural Self-Owner” has “Natural Authority” to authoritatively operate with “Natural Individual Liberty” which is all “Objective Non-Aggressive Action”; “Natural Individual Liberty” is a corollary of “Human Corporeal Property (The Human Body)” and “Human Incorporeal Property (The Mind)” that is authoritatively managed by the individual, who is a “Natural Self-Owner.”
(7) The “Natural Self-Owner” is “Just” to own “Legitimate Exchangeable Property.”
(8) The “Natural Self-Owner” has “Natural Authority” over his or her own “Legitimate Exchangeable Property.”
(9) The “Natural Self-Owner” has “Natural Authority” to defend his or her own “Human Corporeal Property,” “Human Incorporeal Property,” “Individual Cognitive Assets,” “Natural Individual Liberty,” and “Legitimate Exchangeable Property” from any “Unjust Aggressor”; the “Natural Self-Owner” is “Just” to defend what he or she “Legitimately Owns.”
(10) The “Natural Self-Owner” objectively is only obligatory to obey “Objective Just-Law.”
(11) The “Natural Self-Owner” objectively is not obligatory to obey “Objective Unjust Law” without his or her own “Individual Consent.”
FAQ – Questions/Answers
Q – Is Natural Law the same thing as legal law in a social system?
A – No. Natural Law is about observing how things are in the Natural World and observing how the human species is also subject to the Natural Order of things.
Q – Since Individual Authoritative Natural Rights are inherently objective then shouldn’t they be physical objects that can be found in an individual’s body?
A – No. Objective positions are not always simple descriptions of objects, and we can build objective abstraction by using our reason to observe, verify and measure existent data in physical reality.
Examples:
Example (1) – It is objective at this point in space and time, that there is a space between the moon and the earth; yet the space between the moon and the earth is not an object.
Example (2) – The person you have a conversation with thinks their own thoughts; yet their thoughts are not objects. Yet you can verify in conservation by your reason and your senses that they are a thinking individual with thoughts.
Q – Who enforces the Objective Jurisdiction for Individual Authoritative Natural Rights?
A – It is the burden of the human species to defend Objective Individual Authoritative Natural Rights with Objective Just-Law, and can only do so without violating Individual Authoritative Natural Rights in the process.
Q – It is widely taught that “objectivity” is mind independent, so how can you say that the human species has an objective authoritative jurisdiction for Natural Rights?
A – To have a propositional truth statement that will claim that “objectivity is mind independent” is a “subjective proposition” and is void of “objective verifiable data” which causes the proposition to derive from subjective opinion.
Examples:
(1) – If they use any “objective verifiable data” to support their claim then their claim is a contradiction.
(2) – If they use plausibility or subjectivity to support their claim, then their claim is void of “objective verifiable data” and is void of “objective reliability” and falls to mere subjective opinion.
Q – It is widely taught that “reality” may not even exist or exist as we know it, so how can you say that the human species has an objective authoritative jurisdiction for Natural Rights if Natural Law may not even exist?
A – To have a propositional truth statement that will claim that “reality or Natural Law may not exist or exist as we know it” is a “subjective proposition” and is void of “objective verifiable data” which causes the proposition to derive from subjective opinion.
Examples:
(1) – If they use any “objective verifiable data” to support their claim then their claim is a contradiction.
(2) – If they use plausibility or subjectivity to support their claim then their claim is void of “objective verifiable data” and is void of “objective reliability” and falls to mere subjective opinion.
Maurice Elliott
This work – “The Ethical Substrate of Natural Rights” created by Blind Liberalism is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Please click here for content use proposals and requirements.
v.10022015
v.12182015
v.01112016
v.06122016
v.07072016 – symbol
v.07072016
v.07082016
v.07092016
v.07152016
v.07162016
v.01172020
v.11162024
v.12082024